From 0d10ae06e69dae574795941e60d2408706ed15a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?P=C5=99emysl=20Eric=20Janouch?= Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 19:18:15 +0200 Subject: Measured stat performance, io_uring not worth it Large directories are slow for different reasons. --- sdn.cpp | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sdn.cpp b/sdn.cpp index 5012bae..58c24d5 100644 --- a/sdn.cpp +++ b/sdn.cpp @@ -638,9 +638,8 @@ fun make_entry (const struct dirent *f) -> entry { e.info.st_mode = DTTOIF (f->d_type); auto &info = e.info; - // TODO: benchmark just readdir() vs. lstat(), also on dead mounts; - // it might make sense to stat asynchronously in threads - // http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail//linux/kernel/0804.3/1616.html + // io_uring is only at most about 50% faster, though it might help with + // slowly statting devices, at a major complexity cost. if (lstat (f->d_name, &info)) { e.cols[entry::MODES] = apply_attrs ({ decode_type (info.st_mode), L'?', L'?', L'?', L'?', L'?', L'?', L'?', L'?', L'?' }, 0); -- cgit v1.2.3