From 5383dfac9cfc519c5f1651d18edb374d6fce4e6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Přemysl Janouch Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 12:07:21 +0200 Subject: Add "ne?", "ge?", "le?", "gt?" At least in some form. --- ell.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ell.c b/ell.c index 8a46c6b..301d17e 100755 --- a/ell.c +++ b/ell.c @@ -1145,6 +1145,7 @@ defn (fn_not) { return check (ctx, (*result = new_boolean (!truthy (args)))); } +// TODO: "and" and "or" should be short-circuiting special forms defn (fn_and) { bool res = true; for (; args; args = args->next) @@ -1196,9 +1197,13 @@ init_runtime_library (struct context *ctx) { const char *name; ///< Name of the function const char *definition; ///< The defining script } functions[] = { - // TODO: try to think of something useful // FIXME: this "unless" is probably not going to work - { "unless", "arg cond body; if (not (eval @cond)) @body" }, + { "unless", "arg _cond _body; if (not (eval @_cond)) @_body" }, + // TODO: we should be able to apply them to all arguments + { "ne?", "arg _ne1 _ne2; not (eq? @_ne1 @_ne2))" }, + { "ge?", "arg _ge1 _ge2; not (lt? @_ge1 @_ge2))" }, + { "le?", "arg _le1 _le2; ge? @_le2 @_le1" }, + { "gt?", "arg _gt1 _gt2; lt? @_gt2 @_gt1" }, }; bool ok = true; -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2