<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>ell/LICENSE, branch slices</title>
<subtitle>Middle ground between Scheme and Tcl</subtitle>
<id>http://cgit.janouch.name/ell/atom?h=slices</id>
<link rel='self' href='http://cgit.janouch.name/ell/atom?h=slices'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://cgit.janouch.name/ell/'/>
<updated>2018-06-24T01:49:07Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Relicense to 0BSD, update mail address</title>
<updated>2018-06-24T01:49:07Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Přemysl Janouch</name>
<email>p@janouch.name</email>
</author>
<published>2018-06-24T01:49:07Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://cgit.janouch.name/ell/commit/?id=9c238621a56036035f5ab6ec50d1185c99c5a12a'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9c238621a56036035f5ab6ec50d1185c99c5a12a</id>
<content type='text'>
I've come to the conclusion that copyright mostly just stands in the way
of software development.  In my jurisdiction I cannot give up my own
copyright and 0BSD seems to be the closest thing to public domain.

The updated mail address, also used in my author/committer lines,
is shorter and looks nicer.  People rarely interact anyway.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Make this look like a project</title>
<updated>2017-05-21T11:19:44Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Přemysl Janouch</name>
<email>p.janouch@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-05-06T12:12:46Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://cgit.janouch.name/ell/commit/?id=a5f00256b0205e9ac6c8a5a53d5ff492adbedc5b'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a5f00256b0205e9ac6c8a5a53d5ff492adbedc5b</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
